Kel-Tec Forum banner

SUB-2000 Gen 2: 9mm vs. .40cal. That is the question...?

12K views 24 replies 8 participants last post by  Tunester  
I've got the same set up on my 9mm. Scope is attached directly, since I don't want to fold the rifle, high enough not to cowitness. Same linear compensator, except in silver. The forward mag holder is where my triangular forward grip fits. May have to see if I can attach both, though your's seems to satisfy both functions.
The mag holder/forward grip is made by Recover Tactical. I like it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
After reading this thread, I got interested in the 9 to 40 swap. Sent my used 9mm Kel-Tek and got back a new 40 cal one in about 2 weeks from the day I sent it in. After installing all the Mcarbo hardware bits back in the rifle plus Kaw Valley linear compensator, I headed to the range.
WOW! Gun is quieter, smoother, and hits the steel gong with a "crispier" sound. The gun is better in every way! I brought 200 rounds of 40 to the range, thinking I would also practice with my Glock 23(not a fan but one must be proficient with every gun you own, otherwise, why own it in the first place). Well, that G23 never left the holster! I just couldn't get enough of how awesome the rifle has become!
With all this "hating on 40" bull going on, people are missing out on what I am now convinced is the best Sub2K rifle. The best and cheapest(only $40) upgrade you can do to your 9mm Sub2K is 40 cal conversion.
Image

Love my Glock23 Version Sub2000. Also have a CAA MCK conversion for a glock27 that is fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk