[Hatt]

Does Kel-Tec ever plan on offering the Sub 2000 in this caliber or is the design not suited to the power of the 357 SIG. The SIG appears only slightly hotter than the .40 but it would extend the range of the Sub a bit.

 

[Midiman]

I haven't heard that they have any new plans on expanding the SUB line. They're currently way too swamped trying to fill SU-16 and P-3AT orders and fixing same. I've heard nothing about any possible new offerings at the SHOT Show this year.

 

[Flyer]

Also, Kel-Tec has been of the opinion that the .357 is too much for the blow-back design of the SUB to handle.
I, for one, would like to see a 10mm SUB!!! Now THAT would rule!
Flyer

 

[kg4tkh]

sig 357

I have contacted Kel-Tec asking the same question as well information on having a 40sw converted to 357 sig. I recived the following reply.

"I have seen a couple converted to 357 (which was advised against) come in blown up which damaged the frame, the cost of repair was buying a new rifle."

Dwain