Smiley theory
My mag can move fore and aft about 1/32 and it will travel that way under recoil. If you depress a RN round in the mag to the depth the rib in the slide holds it at, the bullet is half above the mag lip. Pushing the barrel rearward and the mag forward, the RN bullet is just about touching the barrel.
Conical bullets can crawl up the space between slide rib (under recoil) and mag top and get socked by the recoilling feed ramp. At the most, I'd just round the sharp edge on the bottom of the feed ramp.
SP bullets in magazines of HP rifles get flattened and heavy bullets in strong recoilling revolvers jump their crimps. Inertia bullet pullers also work well. I doubt frictional forces between slide rib and cartridge case amount to any significant restraining force.
If some kind of buffer could be fitted into the design I believe it might help.
My mag can move fore and aft about 1/32 and it will travel that way under recoil. If you depress a RN round in the mag to the depth the rib in the slide holds it at, the bullet is half above the mag lip. Pushing the barrel rearward and the mag forward, the RN bullet is just about touching the barrel.
Conical bullets can crawl up the space between slide rib (under recoil) and mag top and get socked by the recoilling feed ramp. At the most, I'd just round the sharp edge on the bottom of the feed ramp.
SP bullets in magazines of HP rifles get flattened and heavy bullets in strong recoilling revolvers jump their crimps. Inertia bullet pullers also work well. I doubt frictional forces between slide rib and cartridge case amount to any significant restraining force.
If some kind of buffer could be fitted into the design I believe it might help.