flyer,
thanks for turning me on to the kel-tec range.
have you checked the other sites "admin" posts lately, specifically the one you read that prompted you to tell me about this new forum?
i'll fill you in. seventy some odd members over there have read it and it has not received one comment, pro or con. not one!
it is written rather simply and i dare say many of the readers over there agree with the sentiments therein expressed but perhaps fear the ire of the moderators if they agree with what is laid out there.
i say this, because i figured the "kneel at the kel-tec altar," *edited by Keys*-kisser types would raise *edited by Keys* and brand it subversive or something.
but no, not a peep out of them. they must agree internally but are afraid to express it.
what does anyone have to lose by expressing their opinion on it? i sure wish someone would.
oh well.
mikem
thanks for turning me on to the kel-tec range.
have you checked the other sites "admin" posts lately, specifically the one you read that prompted you to tell me about this new forum?
i'll fill you in. seventy some odd members over there have read it and it has not received one comment, pro or con. not one!
it is written rather simply and i dare say many of the readers over there agree with the sentiments therein expressed but perhaps fear the ire of the moderators if they agree with what is laid out there.
i say this, because i figured the "kneel at the kel-tec altar," *edited by Keys*-kisser types would raise *edited by Keys* and brand it subversive or something.
but no, not a peep out of them. they must agree internally but are afraid to express it.
what does anyone have to lose by expressing their opinion on it? i sure wish someone would.
oh well.
mikem